Skip to content
INCOTERMS Pitfalls in 2025 – How to Choose the Right Clause in International Trade
International Trade Dóra János

INCOTERMS Pitfalls in 2025 – How to Choose the Right Clause in International Trade

INCOTERMS: Common Pitfalls and Smart Selection Strategies

Choosing the wrong INCOTERMS clause can lead to misunderstandings, unexpected extra costs, and even legal complications in international trade. This article helps you navigate common parities and pitfalls—so you can select the most appropriate option based on your actual operational capabilities as an importer or exporter.

The Role of INCOTERMS in International Trade

INCOTERMS (International Commercial Terms) is a globally recognized set of rules that defines the responsibilities, costs, and risks between the buyer and the seller in an international transaction. The latest version, INCOTERMS 2020, is widely used in contracts worldwide. Selecting the right term is not just about pricing—it's about clearly assigning responsibility for logistics, insurance, and customs clearance.

Common Mistakes When Choosing INCOTERMS

Too Much Responsibility on the Seller: The Dangers of DDP

DDP (Delivered Duty Paid) might seem attractive to buyers, as the seller assumes all costs and risks until delivery at the buyer's site—including import duties. However, this often causes serious issues:

  • The seller must understand and comply with all applicable customs and import regulations of the buyer’s country, which vary greatly.
  • In many jurisdictions, customs clearance can only be performed by a local entity or licensed customs broker. Without a local representative, the seller may not be able to complete this process legally.
  • For regulated products (e.g. food, animal origin goods, machinery), import licenses or sanitary inspections may be required, which only the buyer can obtain.

Thus, DDP is not only a risky undertaking for sellers—it may be legally or operationally impossible in many cases.

Too Little Control for the Buyer: The Pitfalls of EXW

EXW (Ex Works) appears simple, as the seller merely makes the goods available at their premises, but all logistics and customs responsibilities fall to the buyer—even in the seller’s country:

  • In cross-border trade, the buyer must handle export customs clearance in the seller's country—often impossible without a local agent.
  • The buyer must arrange international transportation, even if they lack experience or carrier contacts.
  • The buyer bears full risk for damage or loss during transport, even before they have physical access to the shipment.

EXW is usually impractical in real-world international trade and should only be used in exceptional cases, such as transactions between related entities.

Typical Use Cases: Manufacturers vs. Traders

Manufacturers tend to prefer FCA (Free Carrier) or FOB (Free on Board) because they allow delivery within a controlled environment, often immediately after production. FCA, for example, ensures that the seller completes export clearance, while the buyer takes responsibility from the handover to the first carrier. FOB, mainly used in maritime shipping, transfers risk when the goods are loaded onto the ship, providing a clear and predictable transition point.

Traders, on the other hand, often opt for CIF (Cost, Insurance and Freight) or DAP (Delivered at Place). These allow them to offer full-service delivery and build in profit margins for transport and insurance. CIF makes international trade smoother for less experienced buyers but requires clarifying what port costs are included. DAP offers a premium experience—ideal when the trader wants to handle logistics until the buyer’s door, while the buyer handles customs.

Overseas vs. Intra-European Transport

With long-distance overseas trade, CIF or CIP are commonly used if the seller can arrange shipping and insurance efficiently. However, when the buyer prefers to manage logistics, FOB or FCA may be more suitable.

In intra-European transactions—especially between EU members—customs formalities are generally irrelevant. But when goods are exported from a third country (e.g. Switzerland, Norway, UK) into the EU, DAP is often used as a compromise: the seller handles delivery to the buyer’s site, while the buyer remains responsible for customs clearance, EORI registration, permits, and official inspections.

This setup works well when the buyer is familiar with local regulations, and the seller prefers to avoid acting as an importer of record.

Practical Tips for Choosing the Right Parity

  • Know the target country’s logistics and customs rules.
  • Only choose a parity your company is operationally prepared to handle.
  • Consider your buyer's capabilities and preferences.
  • Avoid DDP for regulated goods (animal products, pharmaceuticals, tech machinery) unless you have local representation.
  • Watch out for pricing anomalies: if a supplier offers the same price for EXW, FOB, and DAP, this may signal hidden costs or lack of real logistical support.
  • When in doubt, consult a customs or international trade advisor.

FAQ – 5+1 Frequently Asked Questions

🧭 1. What’s the safest INCOTERMS clause for sellers?
FCA or FOB—these give the seller some control over the export process, yet shift risk to the buyer at a clear transition point. Note: the old "ship's rail" definition of FOB is obsolete. Today, the transfer occurs once the goods are loaded on board. Still, beware of hidden port handling costs that may not be covered.

2. What’s the difference between CIF and CIP?
Both include insurance, but CIF is for sea freight only, while CIP applies to all transport modes and includes a higher insurance standard under INCOTERMS 2020. Also, CIF does not automatically cover terminal handling charges—always confirm who pays those.

📦 3. Can I use multiple INCOTERMS clauses in one contract?
Generally not recommended. Using different clauses within a single transaction creates legal confusion. One clearly defined parity per shipment is best.

📉 4. Why is EXW risky in international trade?
Because the buyer is expected to handle customs export clearance in a foreign country—often unrealistic. All risk and logistics responsibilities lie with the buyer, who might not be prepared.

🚛 5. Who pays for unloading under CIF?
Terminal handling charges (THC) at the destination port are usually not included in CIF. Unless otherwise agreed, the buyer pays. This can lead to unpleasant surprises.

+1: What does it mean if my supplier offers the same price for EXW, FOB, and DAP?
It often indicates the supplier is not truly differentiating services or is not transparent about costs. Always ask for a detailed breakdown.


Explore more insights on our blog and avoid costly international trade pitfalls!


👉 Services we offer: Export document legalization | Export customs clearance | International trade consulting

📬 Stay ahead in global trade. Subscribe to our newsletter to get professional updates, case studies, and actionable tips straight to your inbox!


 

Let’s create something great

Comprehensive foreign trade solutions in one place!